>
Trump's FCC Seeks to Strip Even More Local Control Over 5G Rollout
How - and What - Investors Steal from the Public
President Trump's 'Mission Accomplished' Moment
Silver and the 401(k) Precious-Metals Rule Change for 2026
This tiny dev board is packed with features for ambitious makers
Scientists Discover Gel to Regrow Tooth Enamel
Vitamin C and Dandelion Root Killing Cancer Cells -- as Former CDC Director Calls for COVID-19...
Galactic Brain: US firm plans space-based data centers, power grid to challenge China
A microbial cleanup for glyphosate just earned a patent. Here's why that matters
Japan Breaks Internet Speed Record with 5 Million Times Faster Data Transfer
Advanced Propulsion Resources Part 1 of 2
PulsarFusion a forward-thinking UK aerospace company, is pushing the boundaries of space travel...
Dinky little laser box throws big-screen entertainment from inches away
'World's first' sodium-ion flashlight shines bright even at -40 ºF

For decades, metals have been excluded from most employer-sponsored plans, not because they lacked merit, but because fiduciaries feared the regulatory risk of offering anything outside the conventional stock-and-bond model. That dynamic is changing.
Last year, new federal directives instructed regulators to rethink the rigid constraints surrounding alternative assets in retirement plans. The objective was clear: remove legal ambiguity and provide plan sponsors with a safe harbor to include a broader range of investments—everything from private equity to tangible assets and, crucially, precious metals.
Nothing in the rule forces companies to add metals, of course. But for the first time, it permits it without creating a compliance nightmare. And that may be enough to reshape demand in a market that was already tight long before anyone in Washington decided to modernize the 401(k) framework.