>
Ranchers in Washington are challenging the state over a fundamental constitutional question...
President Milei launched an account in English but it was suspended by X a few hours later.
The Trump Doctrine: "They Have It. We Want It. We Take It."
Event 201 Pandemic Exercise: Segment 4, Communications Discussion and Epilogue Video
Superheat Unveils the H1: A Revolutionary Bitcoin-Mining Water Heater at CES 2026
World's most powerful hypergravity machine is 1,900X stronger than Earth
New battery idea gets lots of power out of unusual sulfur chemistry
Anti-Aging Drug Regrows Knee Cartilage in Major Breakthrough That Could End Knee Replacements
Scientists say recent advances in Quantum Entanglement...
Solid-State Batteries Are In 'Trailblazer' Mode. What's Holding Them Up?
US Farmers Began Using Chemical Fertilizer After WW2. Comfrey Is a Natural Super Fertilizer
Kawasaki's four-legged robot-horse vehicle is going into production
The First Production All-Solid-State Battery Is Here, And It Promises 5-Minute Charging

Ranchers in Washington are challenging the state over a fundamental constitutional question — who gets to punish you, and where?
https://www.savekingranch.com/
What began as a wetlands enforcement case has turned into a much larger fight over jury trials, due process, and the power of administrative boards. The ranchers argue that if the state is seeking punishment-level penalties, the Constitution requires a jury — not an executive-branch tribunal.
This report breaks down:
Why this case is no longer just about wetlands
How administrative boards differ from real courts
Why "compliance" can cross the line into punishment
What this fight means for ranchers, farmers, landowners, and anyone who believes due process still matters
This case could set precedent far beyond Washington State.
WATCH TO THE END for why this matters nationally.
Subscribe for investigative reporting on agriculture, land use, and constitutional rights.
Read the full investigative article on Substack: Yanasa TV