Breaking News
"Refusal to Disclose"
Food Banks All Over The U.S. Are Being Overwhelmed By A Tsunami Of Hungry People
Kids' Online Safety Laws Could Dig a Graveyard for Speech and Privacy
The Only REAL Solution to Digital ID - #SolutionsWatch
Top Tech News
Japan just injected artificial blood into a human. No blood type needed. No refrigeration.
The 6 Best LLM Tools To Run Models Locally
Testing My First Sodium-Ion Solar Battery
A man once paralyzed from the waist down now stands on his own, not with machines or wires,...
Review: Thumb-sized thermal camera turns your phone into a smart tool
Army To Bring Nuclear Microreactors To Its Bases By 2028
Nissan Says It's On Track For Solid-State Batteries That Double EV Range By 2028
Carbon based computers that run on iron
Russia flies strategic cruise missile propelled by a nuclear engine
100% Free AC & Heat from SOLAR! Airspool Mini Split AC from Santan Solar | Unboxing & Install
Blue Origin lunar mission in 2023 and Lockheed pitches NASA a Lunar Lander Concept
A separate lunar lander is needed because the Orion capsule that would sit on an SLS (Space Launch System) rocket cannot land on the moon. Lockheed wants tens of billions to possibly get the SLS and Orion flying and then tens of billions for $150 billion for the lunar gateway in orbit around the moon and then more billions for lunar lander.
The lander would accommodate a crew of four and 2,000 lbs. of cargo payload on the surface for up to two weeks before returning to the Gateway without refueling on the surface.
It would have dry weight of about 24 tons and a fueled weight of 60+ tons.
The manned Orion capsule is currently tracking to about $20 billion in cost. This Lockheed proposed lunar lander is much bigger than Orion and has new liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen propulsion. It looks to me like it would easily rack up $40 billion in cost based on the Lockheed cost track record.