Join James for this important 25th anniversary 9/11 podcast on the mysteries of the 9/11 financial anomalies.

In late 2004, enticed by a review in The Japan Times that praised the lucid prose and the dramatic recounting of events contained in The 9/11 Commission Report, I found myself purchasing that now-infamous document from the local bookstore and reading it cover to cover.

Of course, 9/11 researchers will know by now that The Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States is a tissue of lies and that any information garnered from that report has to be taken with Herculean helpings of sodium chloride.

We know, for example, that the Commission's deeply conflicted Executive Director, Philip Zelikow, had, along with his senior advisor Ernest May, written an outline of that final report, complete with "chapter headings, subheadings and sub-subheadings" before the Commission had convened even a single staff meeting, a move so outrageous that, when it was eventually discovered by commission staffers, caused those staffers to mock the point by creating their own parody document, "The Warren Commision Report—Preemptive Outline," which included the chapter heading "Single Bullet: We Haven't Seen the Evidence Yet. But Really. We're Sure."