>
Iran partially closes Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil choke point, as Tehran holds talks with U.S.
Lindsey Graham: 'US Soldiers Could Be Hit In War With Iran...But It's Worth It.'
It Begins: Mamdani Plans First NYC Property Tax Hike In Decades To Plug $5 Billion Hole
SpaceX Enters Secretive Pentagon Contest To Build Voice-Controlled Drone Swarm Tech: Report
New Spray-on Powder Instantly Seals Life-Threatening Wounds in Battle or During Disasters
AI-enhanced stethoscope excels at listening to our hearts
Flame-treated sunscreen keeps the zinc but cuts the smeary white look
Display hub adds three more screens powered through single USB port
We Finally Know How Fast The Tesla Semi Will Charge: Very, Very Fast
Drone-launching underwater drone hitches a ride on ship and sub hulls
Humanoid Robots Get "Brains" As Dual-Use Fears Mount
SpaceX Authorized to Increase High Speed Internet Download Speeds 5X Through 2026
Space AI is the Key to the Technological Singularity
Velocitor X-1 eVTOL could be beating the traffic in just a year

You can watch the hearing live here (Rumble), here (YouTube) or on here (X).
Today at 4:30 p.m. ET in Colorado, former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters will have her appeal hearing to overturn her conviction on seven counts relating to her efforts to secure a forensic image of the Dominion Voting System software while it was under her custody prior to a "Trusted Build" performed by the Secretary of State of Colorado.
The Gateway Pundit covered her trial and has also covered the efforts to get the 70-year-old Gold Star mother out of prison since the trial.
President Trump has since pardoned Tina Peters; however, the convictions were at the state level, so there is controversy about whether or not the President has the authority to do so.
Jared Polis last week called Tina Peters' sentence "harsh" and said that he would look into possible actions to commute her sentence given her age and lack of criminal history or violence, according to the Denver Post.
Much scrutiny remains over the handling of her case by Judge Matthew Barrett regarding arguments that were forbidden to be made and evidence excluded from her trial. There was also scrutiny over whether or not exculpatory evidence was withheld from Tina Peters' defense and how that evidence might have affected how the investigation began.