>
The AI Bird-Flu Scenario They Just Published
Japan's first robot ambulance works the 9-1-1 lines for humanoids
Cheap smartphone add-on pinpoints hidden cameras to shut down spies
The $600 Tank That Beats a $10,000 Powerwall
Terrifying AI Behavior Even Its Creators Couldn't Explain
WW3 Near-Miss? AI Hallucinated Nuclear Weapons Components Aboard Chinese Vessel Bound For Iran
Stripe Is Building the Toll Road for the Machine Economy
Toyota Dakar hopeful swaps twin-turbo V6 for hydrogen fuel cells
4-min turbo-inflatable cubic camp castle is now available in the USA
Researchers Used Claude To Hack OpenAI Employee Accounts
Chinese Scientists Develop New Oil Refining Method That Cuts Energy Use by 90%
World's smallest CT scanner fits in the palm of your hand
The Tesla Roadster will blow people's minds
Peter Thiel-Funded Company Anduril to Triple the Number of Autonomous Surveillance Towers...

The happy saga of Australian tech entrepreneur Paul Conyngham and his dog Rosie is all over the internet. Conyngham's 8-year-old rescue dog, Rosie, was diagnosed with a fatal skin cancer. Instead of accepting Rosie's allegedly inevitable demise, Conyngham turned to artificial intelligence (both ChatGPT and Grok) to see if he could figure out how to create a personalized anti-cancer vaccine.
Conyngham reached out to Martin Smith, the director of the University of New South Wales (UNSW) Ramaciotti Centre for Genomics, to genetically sequence the DNA from both Rosie and her tumor. They agreed, and Conyngham paid $3,000 for the sequences. (It's worth noting that San Diego–based Element Biosciences soon plans to offer whole genome sequencing for $100.) Then he used Google's DeepMind AlphaFold and ChatGPT to analyze the genetic information and to identify mutated proteins produced by the tumors.
Next Conyngham used Grok to design an mRNA vaccine that boosts the production of tumor-associated antigens enabling Rosie's immune system to identify and destroy tumor cells. Once he had the vaccine recipe, he contacted Pall Thordarson, head of UNSW's RNA Institute, to see if the institute would synthesize the vaccine for him. They agreed. Amazing, right?!
Now for the maddening part: "The red tape was actually harder than the vaccine creation, and I was trying to get an Australian ethics approval to run a drug trial on Rosie," Conyngham told The Australian. "It took me three months, putting two hours aside every single night just typing up this 100-page document."
And even then he couldn't get permission for the researchers at UNSW to inject the bespoke vaccine. But why have bioethical bureaucrats involved at all? It's a personalized vaccine that would have absolutely no effects on any person or animal other than Rosie. Additionally, the patient is a dog. Surely Conyngham was sufficiently competent to provide whatever "informed consent" was needed for Rosie.
Rachel Allavena, a canine immunotherapy professor at the University of Queensland, had experience obtaining bioethical approval for experimental immunotherapies, so she was able to cut through the paperwork, reported the New York Post. Conyngham and Rosie traveled to Brisbane, where the vaccine was injected in December.
The good news is that the vaccine has shrunk Rosie's tumors, and she has become more of her old energetic self.