>
In this day Oct 14, 2024, NASA launched Europa's Clipper
HOLY SH*T! More Subprime Lenders Just Collapsed (Something BIG Is Happening)
A short history of Israel breaking ceasefires w/Max Blumenthal
Kennedy dismantles public health dogmas…
Graphene Dream Becomes a Reality as Miracle Material Enters Production for Better Chips, Batteries
Virtual Fencing May Allow Thousands More Cattle to Be Ranched on Land Rather Than in Barns
Prominent Personalities Sign Letter Seeking Ban On 'Development Of Superintelligence'
Why 'Mirror Life' Is Causing Some Genetic Scientists To Freak Out
Retina e-paper promises screens 'visually indistinguishable from reality'
Scientists baffled as interstellar visitor appears to reverse thrust before vanishing behind the sun
Future of Satellite of Direct to Cellphone
Amazon goes nuclear with new modular reactor plant
China Is Making 800-Mile EV Batteries. Here's Why America Can't Have Them

The illusion of public-private tension has become the defining sleight of hand in global governance. This video explores how the very entities that claim to resist authoritarian overreach—particularly the private sector—are deeply embedded in engineering it. From the World Economic Forum to JP Morgan, unelected financial elites are consolidating power through opaque public-private partnerships, repackaging surveillance capitalism and technocratic control as "free-market" solutions. The rhetoric of decentralization and freedom now masks one of the most aggressive centralizations of economic and political authority in modern history.
Whitney Webb and Mark Moss unpack the manufactured oppositions shaping today's discourse—from public vs. private sector narratives to controlled dissent in independent media. They trace how intelligence-linked financiers like Steve Mnuchin, Craig Cogut, and legacy Wall Street criminals are funding carbon markets, programmable money systems, and bio-surveillance under the guise of sustainability and national security. The analysis cuts through the misleading CBDC debates, exposing how stablecoins and digital IDs offered by private entities may be equally—if not more—dangerous than state-backed versions. The central thesis is sobering: both political wings are being manipulated toward the same endpoint, and only localized resistance and critical thinking offer a way out of this manufactured consensus.