>
Wise words (Elon Musk responding to Ron Paul's tweet on the Big Beautiful Bill)
People Are Being Involuntarily Committed, Jailed After Spiraling Into "ChatGPT Psychosis"
Dr. Lee Merritt: What You Need to Know About Parasites and Biowarfare
How We Manage a Garden With 11 Kids (2025 Garden Tour)
xAI Grok 3.5 Renamed Grok 4 and Has Specialized Coding Model
AI goes full HAL: Blackmail, espionage, and murder to avoid shutdown
BREAKING UPDATE Neuralink and Optimus
1900 Scientists Say 'Climate Change Not Caused By CO2' – The Real Environment Movement...
New molecule could create stamp-sized drives with 100x more storage
DARPA fast tracks flight tests for new military drones
ChatGPT May Be Eroding Critical Thinking Skills, According to a New MIT Study
How China Won the Thorium Nuclear Energy Race
Sunlight-Powered Catalyst Supercharges Green Hydrogen Production by 800%
TLDR:
The Bottom Line: What's marketed as "digital democracy" is actually a sophisticated power grab by tech elites, transforming genuine civic participation into managed participation theater while threatening cognitive liberty itself.
The Elite Capture Machine
The AI World Society (AIWS), led by former Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis and Vietnamese entrepreneur Nguyen Anh Tuan, exemplifies how "digital democracy" initiatives concentrate power among academic and political elites. Their latest venture—blockchain-certified "Esteemed Digital Assets"—literally tokenizes political legacies, creating artificial scarcity around historical narratives while an elite board of MIT and Harvard affiliates controls the curation.
Even more concerning is their "Music for Humanity" initiative, which uses "AI-amplified music" for what can only be described as emotional engineering—bearing striking similarities to the HeartMath Global Coherence Initiative's attempts at technologically-mediated consciousness manipulation.
Taiwan's "Success Story" Exposed
Taiwan's vTaiwan platform, celebrated globally as a digital democracy triumph, reveals the fundamental flaws in these systems when examined closely. The brutal reality: only 0.04% of Taiwan's population actually engaged with the platform, and legislators admitted they don't take it seriously because the government isn't required to adopt recommendations.