>
U.S. evacuates 20,000 citizens as Middle East war intensifies
MAJOR GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS UPDATE: The Closure Of The Strait of Hormuz For Just 4 Days...
Counting The Costs: Another War Is Not What America Needed
Researchers Train Bacteria to Consume Tumors from the Inside Out
The Pentagon is looking for the SpaceX of the ocean.
Major milestone by 3D printing an artificial cornea using a specialized "bioink"...
Scientists at Rice University have developed an exciting new two-dimensional carbon material...
Footage recorded by hashtag#Meta's AI smart glasses is sent to offshore contractors...
ELON MUSK: "With something like Neuralink… we effectively become maybe one with the AI."
DARPA Launches New Program Generative Optogenetics, GO,...
Anthropic Outpaces OpenAI Revenue 10X, Pentagon vs. Dario, Agents Rent Humans | #234
Ordering a Tiny House from China, what's the real COST?
New video may offer glimpse of secret F-47 fighter
Donut Lab's Solid-State Battery Charges Fast. But Experts Still Have Questions

Starr's analysis will be considered controversial, because it shows EMP to be a grave risk to the safety of nuclear power plants. The Nuclear Regulator Commission (NRC), a captured agency, denies that EMP poses a threat because the nuclear utilities do not want to be forced to spend lots of money to correct design flaws in their plants.
EMP is considered a "non-design basis event", and was not considered in the design and construction of US nuclear power plants — none of which were designed or retrofitted to be protected from EMP. Officers of the US Air Force, who formed the Electromagnetic Defense Task Force (EDTF), issued two reports (in 2018 and 2019) that identified the EMP risk to both nuclear reactors and their spent fuel pools, and called for comprehensive testing to prove the electronics and emergency power systems at the plants were safe from EMP. The NRC was forced to consider the EDTF concerns but maintained its position and did no testing.
The electric utilities have also attempted to downplay the dangers of EMP. They set up an "independent" organization, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), which receives funding from the Department of Energy and Department of State, that produced a study that minimized the dangers that EMP poses to the grid and critical national infrastructure. The EDTF issued a detailed report that rejected the findings of the EPRI. The entire subject of EMP has been complicated by vested interests.
Trump was the only president who has showed some concerned with EMP. During his first term, directives were issued that indicated the US was finally going to act to protect its power grids, etc. But all that was shut down by Biden. A Grid Resilience bill has been introduced in the Texas legislature that requires the Texas power grid to be protected from EMP.
Perhaps the belief is that nuclear weapons are too deadly to be used and, therefore, the threat is not present. But humans have proven capable of disastrous mistakes, and the US government did have a plan for a nuclear attack on the Soviet Union. President John F. Kennedy would not go along with it, and this could have been one reason for his assassination.