>
Bret Weinstein's Thoughts on Charlie Kirk and Iran
We Are the Villains in This Story
My Prediction For the War with Iran
Foreign Hacker Cracked Into FBI's Epstein Files In 2023, Was 'Disgusted' At Child Sexual
Human Brain Cells Merge With Silica To Play DOOM
Will Yann LeCun Provide The Next Breakthrough In AI?
Human Brain Cells Merge With Silica To Play DOOM
Solar And Storage Could Reshape Rural Electricity Markets
With World Seemingly At War, DARPA Finds Time To Unveil The X-76
The world's first diesel plug-in hybrid pickup truck is here
US advances nuclear revival with approval of Natrium Gen IV reactor
Your Contractor Doesn't Want Me To Show You This!
CEO of Blacklisted AI Company Anthropic, Dario Amodei Says His AI Models 'May Have Gained...

That's exactly what happened with a case Justice Neil Gorsuch got completely wrong. At the time, it might have seemed like just another ruling, but looking back, it's downright bone chilling. Little did he know that very decision would become a weapon for the left—a legal machine gun used to shoot their warped trans agenda into the hearts and minds of innocent and vulnerable kids.
It's no wonder Justice Gorsuch was dead silent today when a major case landed before the court. The case, US v. Skrmetti, tackles the constitutionality of a state ban on so-called "gender-affirming" care for minors.
But here's the kicker—this high-profile case ties directly back to the infamous 2020 ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County. That's the case Gorsuch totally fumbled, even going so far as to author the court's majority opinion. It was that decision that handed the Biden regime the keys to kick open the door for their ghoulish kids' trans agenda.
Maybe, just maybe, as Justice Gorsuch sat there in silence today, he wasn't pondering the case in front of him—while also being haunted by the ripple effects of his 2020 misstep.
Justice Gorsuch remained entirely silent throughout oral arguments at #SCOTUS today in the Court's most high-profile case, U.S. v. Skrmetti. That case concerns the constitutionality of a state ban on so-called gender-affirming care for minors under the age of 18.
My thought?
The justice is reckoning with the ghost of Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) in which he authored the majority opinion for the Court that held under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, employment discrimination prohibitions based on "sex" also included "gender identity."
From that decision, a host of ills was born. The Biden administration has used Bostock to expand gender identitarianism in healthcare, education, housing, & more.
Today, the rent came due.