>
The Government contract awarded to clean up the fire debris after the Lahaina, Maui fires...
Social Security Supervisor Frauds You Of Millions In Benefits
KEY ANALYSIS: The Israeli Strike On Iran Is Designed To Trap President Trump...
Stewart Rhodes Explains How Pam Bondi And Kash Patel Are Failing The American People...
Hydrogen Gas Blend Will Reduce Power Plant's Emissions by 75% - as it Helps Power 6 States
The Rise & Fall of Dome Houses: Buckminster Fuller's Geodesic Domes & Dymaxion
New AI data centers will use the same electricity as 2 million homes
Is All of This Self-Monitoring Making Us Paranoid?
Cavorite X7 makes history with first fan-in-wing transition flight
Laser-powered fusion experiment more than doubles its power output
Watch: Jetson's One Aircraft Just Competed in the First eVTOL Race
Cab-less truck glider leaps autonomously between road and rail
Can Tesla DOJO Chips Pass Nvidia GPUs?
Iron-fortified lumber could be a greener alternative to steel beams
Carriers of the BRCA1 cancer gene had a significantly increased risk of breast cancer if they used hormonal contraception (HC), pooled cohort data showed.
Breast cancer risk increased by 29% in BRCA1 carriers who reported any use of HC during at least one 12-month continuous period. The risk also increased with duration of HC use, but separate analyses showed no increased risk associated with current use within the past year, 1-5 years in the past, 6-10 years before, or more than 10 years.
The analysis showed no evidence of increased breast cancer risk for BRCA2 carriers who used HC, reported Kelly-Anne Phillips, MD, MBBS, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Center in Melbourne, Australia, and co-authors in the Journal of Clinical Oncologyopens in a new tab or window.
"When counseling women, absolute risks are more useful than relative risks," the authors noted in their discussion of the findings. "These absolute risks will be different for different women, so incorporating our findings into risk prediction models such as CanRiskopens in a new tab or window would assist in providing personalized estimates."
"Decisions about use of HC in women at increased risk for BC [breast cancer] due to BRCA1 mutations need to carefully weigh the absolute risks and benefits," they added. "While shorter-term use may result in only small increases, prolonged cumulative use may result in larger increases in absolute BC risk that may not be acceptable to some women."
An individualized approach to patient counseling about breast cancer risk in BRCA1 carriers is advisable, agreed Yara Abdou, MD, of the University of North Carolina and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center in Chapel Hill.
"These results suggest that for BRCA1 mutation carriers, HC use should be approached with caution, particularly for prolonged durations," Abdou told MedPage Today via email. "Clinicians should engage in detailed risk-benefit discussions with BRCA1 carriers considering HC use, emphasizing the potential increased risk of breast cancer."
"For BRCA2 carriers, the lack of a significant association suggests a lower risk; however, the relatively small number of breast cancer cases in this group warrants cautious interpretation."
The observational design of the study limits the ability to establish a causal relationship between HC use and breast cancer in BRCA1 carriers, Abdou noted. Additionally, the median follow-up of 5.9 years for BRCA1 carriers and 5.6 years for BRCA2 carriers might not be long enough to capture the long-term effects of HC use on breast cancer risk.