>
'UNFAIR': Mamdani's city-run grocer plan SLAPPED with lawsuit
Trump Says If Iran Had a Nuclear Weapon, He Would Have Politely Called the Supreme Leader...
Tucker Carlson: We are on the brink of a world war that ends with the use of nuclear weapons
Who is trying to destroy the United States and the world?
Freezable titanium plate keeps your cooler chilled way longer than ice packs
Review: Affordable thermal device is made for discovering life outdoors
AI Whistleblower Tells Tucker How AI Could Kill All Humans by 2040
You Hate Flock? Well There's More...
Will Spiking Diesel Prices Drive Autonomous Trucking?
Chinese Concept Video Imagines the Future of Warfare
OPTIMUS CONFIRMED: 15,000 Bots This Year -- Tesla to $3,000
What is Going On With Robotaxi and Cybercab? Here Are All the Answers
Floating data center would provide water and electricity to 32,000 homes
OpenAI Cuts Off Elon's Cursor, Humanity's First Star Probe, and Trump's Nuclear Mars Shi

The slower mission times are for chemical rockets where we barely get out of Earth orbit with a small rocket engine. SpaceX Starship can refuel after reaching orbit to enable faster orbits (straighter and less looping paths) to go to Mars. This makes 90 day times each way easy with chemical Starship and even more wasteful but still chemical rockets to Mars in 45 days each way.
This is calculated by Ozan Bellik.
In 2033 there are opportunities to do a high thrust ~45 day outbound transit with a ~10.5km/s TMI (trans Mars injection). If you refill in an elliptical orbit that's at LEO+2.5-3km/s then the TMI burn requirement goes down to 7.5-8km/s. A SpaceX Starship with 1200 tons of fuel should be able to do with roughly 150 tons of burnout mass. This is enough for ship, residuals, and a crew cabin with enough consumables to last a moderately sized crew for the 45 day transit. The trouble is that once you get there, you are approaching Mars at ~15km/s.
One way to solve this would be to powerbrake to 8.5km/s and aerobrake from there. This needs an additional ~6.5km/s, and the most straightforward way to solve that is to send a fleet of expendable tankers alongside the crew ship and refill en route. This would call for 5 or more fully filled 2000 ton tankers in elliptical orbit. SpaceX could do it.
Alright, here we go.
— Ozan Bellik (@BellikOzan) November 28, 2023
In 2033 there are opportunities to do a high thrust ~45 day outbound transit with a ~10.5km/s TMI.
If you refill in an elliptical orbit that's at LEO+2.5-3km/s, your TMI burn requirement goes down to 7.5-8km/s, which a Starship w/ 1200t of prop should be… https://t.co/Rf2dDOOzwn