>
Hidden Globalist Operatives Inside the Trump Administration...
White House Has Presented Iran With Written Nuke Deal Proposal In Huge First
Trump says 'nothing's going to happen until Putin and I get together' to solve Ukraine
Leadership & Company Culture From The Former CEO of WD-40 | Garry Ridge #436 | The Way I Heard It
Cab-less truck glider leaps autonomously between road and rail
Can Tesla DOJO Chips Pass Nvidia GPUs?
Iron-fortified lumber could be a greener alternative to steel beams
One man, 856 venom hits, and the path to a universal snakebite cure
Dr. McCullough reveals cancer-fighting drug Big Pharma hopes you never hear about…
EXCLUSIVE: Raytheon Whistleblower Who Exposed The Neutrino Earthquake Weapon In Antarctica...
Doctors Say Injecting Gold Into Eyeballs Could Restore Lost Vision
Dark Matter: An 86-lb, 800-hp EV motor by Koenigsegg
Spacetop puts a massive multi-window workspace in front of your eyes
Combustion engines are tried and true, and however angry they might look and sound in a top-fuel dragster or space rocket booster, the combustion process of oxidizing fuel in air is relatively slow and predictable. Detonation, on the other hand, is as chaotic and destructive as it sounds. It's how most bombs work; you take an explosive fuel and hit it with a jolt of energy, and the chemical bonds holding each molecule together break apart, releasing wild amounts of energy in a shockwave that expands at supersonic speed.
NASA, along with many other groups, wants to harness these explosions for a couple of key reasons. Firstly, detonation engines have a considerably higher theoretical level of efficiency than combustion engines, perhaps as much as 25%; they should be able to produce more thrust using less fuel and a smaller rocket. In the engineering and economics of space flight, that means cheaper launches, more billable payload, and greater distances.