>
The Real Cost of Supporting the Zionist Secular State of Israel
Treasury Yield 30 Years (^TYX)
Apoplectic Netanyahu rages at Trump in private as 'disastrous' Iran deal leaves him longing.
The American Consumer Is Piss Broke
Elon and SpaceX Have Made AI Training 10 Times Faster
Oklo COO Says Nuclear Waste Could Power America For 150 Years
SpaceX Announces LARGEST Starship Mission Ever! They've never done this before!
Cars Are Fast Becoming Dystopian Prison Pods...
Our Emergency Water Plan Wasn't Good Enough - So We Built This
Sodium Ion Batteries Can Reach 100 Gigawatt Per Hour Per Year Scale in 2027
Juiced Bikes proves capable electric motorcycles don't have to cost a lot
Headlight projectors turn your car into a drive-in theater
US To Develop Small Modular Nuclear Reactors For Commercial Shipping
New York Mandates Kill Switch and Surveillance Software in Your 3D Printer ...

Combustion engines are tried and true, and however angry they might look and sound in a top-fuel dragster or space rocket booster, the combustion process of oxidizing fuel in air is relatively slow and predictable. Detonation, on the other hand, is as chaotic and destructive as it sounds. It's how most bombs work; you take an explosive fuel and hit it with a jolt of energy, and the chemical bonds holding each molecule together break apart, releasing wild amounts of energy in a shockwave that expands at supersonic speed.
NASA, along with many other groups, wants to harness these explosions for a couple of key reasons. Firstly, detonation engines have a considerably higher theoretical level of efficiency than combustion engines, perhaps as much as 25%; they should be able to produce more thrust using less fuel and a smaller rocket. In the engineering and economics of space flight, that means cheaper launches, more billable payload, and greater distances.