>
In 60 Days EVERYTHING changes for the U.S. Dollar & it's going to be wild
OMG: Johnson & Johnson Lead Scientist and Executive Admit Baby Powder Contained...
The Wearables Trap: How the Government Plans to Monitor, Score, and Control You
The Streetwing: a flying car for true adventure seekers
Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57%...
Unitree G1 vs Boston Dynamics Atlas vs Optimus Gen 2 Robot– Who Wins?
LFP Battery Fire Safety: What You NEED to Know
Final Summer Solar Panel Test: Bifacial Optimization. Save Money w/ These Results!
MEDICAL MIRACLE IN JAPAN: Paralyzed Man Stands Again After Revolutionary Stem Cell Treatment!
Insulator Becomes Conducting Semiconductor And Could Make Superelastic Silicone Solar Panels
Slate Truck's Under $20,000 Price Tag Just Became A Political Casualty
Wisdom Teeth Contain Unique Stem Cell That Can Form Cartilage, Neurons, and Heart Tissue
The overhead cost for error correction improves as gate error rate declines.
The Google Quantum supremacy demonstrations confirmed the quantum world has huge computing resources. We are in the noisy qubit era. We can explore heuristic quantum algorithms. We might get near-term quantum advantage for useful applications but this is not guaranteed.
Near-term algorithms should be designed with noise resilience (noisy qubits) in mind.
We will get good truly random number generation and will explore new quantum simulation of complex systems.
Lower quantum gate error rates will lower the overhead cost of quantum error correction, and also extend the reach of quantum algorithms which do not use error correction.
Dequantization: Practical uses of quantum linear algebra and of quantum-inspired classical algorithms are still unclear.