Breaking News
Renogy Shadowflux Shading Test! Worth the Hype?!
Moment Bill Maher Makes STUNNING ADMISSION
Disaster Survival Hygiene: What to Do When the Water Stops
These Are The Worst States To Be A Gun Owner
Top Tech News
Hydrogen Gas Blend Will Reduce Power Plant's Emissions by 75% - as it Helps Power 6 States
The Rise & Fall of Dome Houses: Buckminster Fuller's Geodesic Domes & Dymaxion
New AI data centers will use the same electricity as 2 million homes
Is All of This Self-Monitoring Making Us Paranoid?
Cavorite X7 makes history with first fan-in-wing transition flight
Laser-powered fusion experiment more than doubles its power output
Watch: Jetson's One Aircraft Just Competed in the First eVTOL Race
Cab-less truck glider leaps autonomously between road and rail
Can Tesla DOJO Chips Pass Nvidia GPUs?
Iron-fortified lumber could be a greener alternative to steel beams
Moon Direct SpaceX Falcon Heavy Plan is 6 Years Faster and 50 times Cheaper than NASA
This is all better than nothing, but the NASA approach is a waste of money. However, this is part of promoting the wasteful Lunar Gateway program. Lunar Gateway is going to cost $100+ billion. It is using the International Space Station (ISS) style technology to build a space station orbiting the moon. It is better to waste money on space and get more space capability than it is to waste money on the military.
About 30 space shuttle launches were used to add components and modules to assemble the ISS. The Lunar Gateway looks like it will be built from about ten modules.
We could do a lot better in space and spend less money and get results sooner. We could use a few SpaceX Falcon Heavies and land directly on the moon with about 8 to 11 tons of moon base at a time. The SpaceX Falcon Heavy is flying now.