Breaking News
Why summer flies by as an adult--but lasted forever when you were 10
Who's Winning The Robotaxi Race? It's... Complicated
Israel hammers Lebanon despite reported deal with Hezbollah: As it happened (VIDEOS, PHOTOS)
How Big Pharma Rigs Clinical Trials--And Gets Away With It
Top Tech News
Heads up: Apparently the government is hiding cameras inside fake utility boxes
Sodium Batteries And EVs That Power The Grid: Inside GM's Big Energy Push
NUCLEAR ENGINE - UNLIMITED LUXURY - 20 YEARS WITHOUT REFUELING
China Unveils Nuclear-Powered Floating Hub For Green Shipping
China Launches World's 1st Commercial Brain Chip, Beating Elon Musk's Neuralink!
Modular next-gen US nuclear reactor goes critical
How EMF's cause disease
This Company Will Add Phone, AirPod, and Smartwatch Trackers to License Plate Readers
Elon Details SpaceX AI Data Center in Space Details and Roadmap
5-in-1 miniature surgical robot is the size of a seed 
Moon Direct SpaceX Falcon Heavy Plan is 6 Years Faster and 50 times Cheaper than NASA
This is all better than nothing, but the NASA approach is a waste of money. However, this is part of promoting the wasteful Lunar Gateway program. Lunar Gateway is going to cost $100+ billion. It is using the International Space Station (ISS) style technology to build a space station orbiting the moon. It is better to waste money on space and get more space capability than it is to waste money on the military.
About 30 space shuttle launches were used to add components and modules to assemble the ISS. The Lunar Gateway looks like it will be built from about ten modules.
We could do a lot better in space and spend less money and get results sooner. We could use a few SpaceX Falcon Heavies and land directly on the moon with about 8 to 11 tons of moon base at a time. The SpaceX Falcon Heavy is flying now.