Breaking News
This is the future we shall bring into being
Elon Musk's Vision For The Future Looks Like A Movie
Phosphorus Munitions Fired by Israel Burn Groves, Orchards in Southern Lebanon
Iran's IRGC Warns It Will Expand 'Geography of the War' If the US Attacks Again
Top Tech News
BEYOND THE MOON: NASA plans a nuclear-powered fleet to push DEEPER into space
Big Oil Backs Mazama's $135 Million Bet On Superhot Geothermal
Quantum compass takes flight on Northrop's Lumberjack drone
Terrifying AI Behavior Even Its Creators Couldn't Explain
WW3 Near-Miss? AI Hallucinated Nuclear Weapons Components Aboard Chinese Vessel Bound For Iran
Stripe Is Building the Toll Road for the Machine Economy
Toyota Dakar hopeful swaps twin-turbo V6 for hydrogen fuel cells
4-min turbo-inflatable cubic camp castle is now available in the USA
Researchers Used Claude To Hack OpenAI Employee Accounts
Chinese Scientists Develop New Oil Refining Method That Cuts Energy Use by 90%
Moon Direct SpaceX Falcon Heavy Plan is 6 Years Faster and 50 times Cheaper than NASA
This is all better than nothing, but the NASA approach is a waste of money. However, this is part of promoting the wasteful Lunar Gateway program. Lunar Gateway is going to cost $100+ billion. It is using the International Space Station (ISS) style technology to build a space station orbiting the moon. It is better to waste money on space and get more space capability than it is to waste money on the military.
About 30 space shuttle launches were used to add components and modules to assemble the ISS. The Lunar Gateway looks like it will be built from about ten modules.
We could do a lot better in space and spend less money and get results sooner. We could use a few SpaceX Falcon Heavies and land directly on the moon with about 8 to 11 tons of moon base at a time. The SpaceX Falcon Heavy is flying now.