>
$100 Solar Panel vs $100 Wind Turbine in a Normal Backyard
Tucker Carlson on Iran War latest, Trump's MAGA collapse, & Israel's media blackout | Redact
INDIANA DRAWS THE LINE ON FARMS
$35,000 Solar System Cannot Charge to 100%?? Seriously Sol Ark and Deye?
Human Brain Cells Merge With Silica To Play DOOM
Will Yann LeCun Provide The Next Breakthrough In AI?
Human Brain Cells Merge With Silica To Play DOOM
Solar And Storage Could Reshape Rural Electricity Markets
With World Seemingly At War, DARPA Finds Time To Unveil The X-76
The world's first diesel plug-in hybrid pickup truck is here
US advances nuclear revival with approval of Natrium Gen IV reactor
Your Contractor Doesn't Want Me To Show You This!
CEO of Blacklisted AI Company Anthropic, Dario Amodei Says His AI Models 'May Have Gained...

In the 1970s, Princeton physicist Gerard O'Neill led two Stanford/NASA Ames Research Center summer studies that supported the feasibility of kilometer-scale orbital cities. These studies assumed that the NASA space shuttle would operate as expected, a flight every week or two, $500/lb. to orbit, and one failure per 100,000 flights. The studies also assumed that a more efficient follow-on heavy-lift launcher would be developed.
Now the SpaceX BFR being developed over the next 5 years or so could deliver low-cost launch that did not happen with the Space Shuttle. The SpaceX Falcon Heavy with reusable first stages could achieve the $500 per pound to orbit target. A fully reusable SpaceX BFR should be able to get well below $500 per pound. SpaceX BFR has a target of $5 to 10 million per launch of 150 tons. A cost of $30 million per launch would enable $100 per pound. SpaceX BFR plans more redundant engines to improve the safety and reliabilty.