>
Tucker Carlson on Why He Interviewed Nick Fuentes and What He Wanted to Convey To Him
The Global War on Christianity Just Got a Whole Lot Worse, and Ted Cruz Doesn't Care
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: The Globalists Are Trying To Trigger Stock Market Crash Worse Than 1929...
ICE's 'Frightening' Facial Recognition App is Scanning US Citizens Without Their Consent
HUGE 32kWh LiFePO4 DIY Battery w/ 628Ah Cells! 90 Minute Build
What Has Bitcoin Become 17 Years After Satoshi Nakamoto Published The Whitepaper?
Japan just injected artificial blood into a human. No blood type needed. No refrigeration.
The 6 Best LLM Tools To Run Models Locally
Testing My First Sodium-Ion Solar Battery
A man once paralyzed from the waist down now stands on his own, not with machines or wires,...
Review: Thumb-sized thermal camera turns your phone into a smart tool
Army To Bring Nuclear Microreactors To Its Bases By 2028
Nissan Says It's On Track For Solid-State Batteries That Double EV Range By 2028

In the 1970s, Princeton physicist Gerard O'Neill led two Stanford/NASA Ames Research Center summer studies that supported the feasibility of kilometer-scale orbital cities. These studies assumed that the NASA space shuttle would operate as expected, a flight every week or two, $500/lb. to orbit, and one failure per 100,000 flights. The studies also assumed that a more efficient follow-on heavy-lift launcher would be developed.
Now the SpaceX BFR being developed over the next 5 years or so could deliver low-cost launch that did not happen with the Space Shuttle. The SpaceX Falcon Heavy with reusable first stages could achieve the $500 per pound to orbit target. A fully reusable SpaceX BFR should be able to get well below $500 per pound. SpaceX BFR has a target of $5 to 10 million per launch of 150 tons. A cost of $30 million per launch would enable $100 per pound. SpaceX BFR plans more redundant engines to improve the safety and reliabilty.