Breaking News
House Votes To Extend Surveillance Powers Until April 30
US Chemists Turn Natural Gas Into Liquid Fuel Without High Heat And Pressures
Critical Metals Shares Surge 40% After Expanding Rare Earth Mining Position In Greenland
How Many Scoundrels Like Swalwell in Washington DC?
Top Tech News
Researchers Turn Car Battery Acid and Plastic Waste into Clean Hydrogen and New Plastic
'Spin-flip' system pushes solar cell energy conversion efficiency past 100%
A Startup Has Been Quietly Pitching Cloned Human Bodies to Transfer Your Brain Into
DEYE 215kWh LiFePO4 + 125,000W Inverter + 200,000W MPPT = Run A Factory Offgrid!!
China's Unitree Unveils Robot With "Human-Like Physique" That Can Outrun Most People
This $200 Black Shaft Air Conditions Your Home For Free Forever -- Why Is It Banned in the U.S.?
Engineers have developed a material capable of self-repairing more than 1,000 times,...
They bypassed the eye entirely.
The Most Dangerous Race on Earth Isn't Nuclear - It's Quantum.
This Plasma Stove Cooks Hotter Than The Sun 
Fully reusable Spacex Rockets would be lower cost than Skylon spaceplanes
Ashley used a reference document from Reaction Engines. The document is no longer available online.
Skylon remains uncompetitive when compared with even the partially reusable (let alone the fully reusable) Falcon rockets:
* Skylon costs about 30 times more than a Falcon 9 and 20 times more than a Falcon Heavy. While it is hypothetically more reliable (though I question this), such an enormous difference has a significant impact on insurance costs, which drives up operating costs further.
* Using an exotic and relatively expensive combination of jet and rocket propellants, it costs about six times more to refuel Skylon than a Falcon 9, and twice as much as a Falcon Heavy.