Breaking News
The Vindication of Dr. Bhattacharya
Lessons from the 2025 European Power Grid Failure
Surprise, Surprise: Bibi Discovers "Secret Iranian Nuclear Weapons Facility" in Iran
Tetris founder's family village is collapse-proof, remote offgrid-topia
Top Tech News
Cab-less truck glider leaps autonomously between road and rail
Can Tesla DOJO Chips Pass Nvidia GPUs?
Iron-fortified lumber could be a greener alternative to steel beams
One man, 856 venom hits, and the path to a universal snakebite cure
Dr. McCullough reveals cancer-fighting drug Big Pharma hopes you never hear about…
EXCLUSIVE: Raytheon Whistleblower Who Exposed The Neutrino Earthquake Weapon In Antarctica...
Doctors Say Injecting Gold Into Eyeballs Could Restore Lost Vision
Node without Consent
Dark Matter: An 86-lb, 800-hp EV motor by Koenigsegg
Spacetop puts a massive multi-window workspace in front of your eyes
If EMdrive is real and scales with Q factor then we get almost Star Trek level Technology
If the NASA emdrive performance of 1.2 millinewtons per kilowatt.
8.3 TeraWatts of power would be needed to provide 10 million newtons of thrust to accelerate a 1000 ton space-craft at 1 gee of acceleration. We have no power source that could generate 8.3 TeraWatts for a 1000 ton spacecraft.
If EMDrive performance increases with the Q-factor as some have theorized, then we could tune the cavity and make it superconducting. If we take the NASA EM-Drives and pump the Q factor to ~30 million, then about 2 GW power is needed for the sustained 1 gee thrust.
Theoretical nuclear fission reactors could power such a spacecraft. Gas-core or magnetic collimator fission-fragment reactor might be work but have been theoretically designed and have very limited experimental development.A fast-spectrum reactor with a thermal output of ~ 6 GW and ~35 % thermal conversion efficiency would be a first pass design to supply the power.