>
Israel First: GOP Reps Introduce Bill Extending Taxpayer Benefits to Americans Who Serve in IDF
Destroying Our Connection to God with Gene Editing Injections
UK Government & NHS Infected Blood Scandal Chronicled in Massive Inquiry
REPORT: Dr. Peter McCullough warns there is going to be a "tidal wave of diseases"...
A Staggering 19x Energy Jump in Capacitors May Be the Beginning of the End for Batteries
Telegram Disabled My Account. Good Riddance
China's floating nuke plants up South China Sea ante
'Tungsten wall' leads to nuclear fusion breakthrough
Matt Taibbi Uncensored: Finance A 'Street Scam'
This Bonkers 656-Foot 'AirYacht' Concept Can Transport 40 Guests Around the World
DR. BRYAN ARDIS | How Much Nicotine Should You Use? How It Can Heal Parkinson's and More...
Elon Musk's Neuralink begins clinical trials in Phoenix
Scientists Are Making Jet Fuel from Landfill Gas Aiming to Launch Circular Economy
During Thursday's deliberations at the U.S. Supreme Court on former President Donald Trump's immunity claim, Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh warned that a decision in the case has future implications for whether future presidents are shielded from vicious cycles of malicious prosecution that could effectively end the presidency as we know it.
In the course of two-and-a-half hours of oral arguments on April 25, justices on the Supreme Court appeared skeptical of a ruling by a federal appeals court that rejected President Trump's claim that he has absolute immunity from criminal charges based on his official acts as president.
President Trump was indicted by special counsel Jack Smith in August 2023 on charges of conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
Pleading not guilty, the former president has argued that he should receive absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for acts that fell within the scope of his official duties. The exception to this immunity, he has argued, is if Congress impeaches and convicts him on charges.
A federal appeals court rejected that argument, claiming that presidents must face prosecution for alleged criminal wrongdoing.
The question that is now before the Supreme Court is: "Whether and if so to what extent does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office?"
During Thursday's deliberations, the justices weighed the claim of absolute immunity that, if adopted, would stop Mr. Smith's prosecution of the former president dead in its tracks.